OOA '20 Questions: event queue overrun

Home Forums Executable UML and xtUML Methodology OOA '20 Questions: event queue overrun

Tagged: 

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Author Posts
Author Posts
September 26, 2019 at 2:46 pm #6291

Lee Riemenschneider
Participant

Method: Event Dispatch (2)

event queue overrun

dispatch of delayed events in the face of full queues

Should delayed events be dispatched when expired
without regard to the presence of non-delayed events?

[Scenario] Consider a domain with non-empty event queues and
pending timers. At least one delayed event is past its expiration time.

[Edge Case] Consider a cyclic, “self-stimulating” state machine (or
interacting set of state machines) that spins with no delay.
The concept of ‘simulated time’ or ‘Discrete Event Simulation’ may
inform this discussion.

September 27, 2019 at 4:59 pm #6309

Lee Riemenschneider
Participant

Again, like Event Dispatch (1), this should be part of the architecture definition. This could be handled like some operating systems handle threads/processes via a series of priority boosts until the neglected process gets a high enough priority to be handled.

February 17, 2020 at 1:16 pm #6356

Nils
Participant

I agree, this is an issue for the Platform Specific Model (PSM) to handle, similar to a stack overflow. The Plaform Independent Model (PIM) just assumes (and correctly so) that events are delivered. This is true for bridges as well as class instances. If there are explicit requirements on QoS, then that should either be modeled in the PIM or formulated as a requirement on the particular PSM.

/Nils

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.