- February 3, 2016 at 3:05 pm #5555
I’m looking into the meta-model included in the 5.2 version and comparing the model with the schema in 5.2 of the mc.c.source plugin. These does not seams to be consistent. I thought that the schema was generated based on the meta-model. Is it the intention that these shall differ?
I suppose that the pre_builder output is consistent with the meta-model?February 3, 2016 at 6:36 pm #5556keithbrownKeymaster
Where exactly are you seeing a difference? Are you looking at the ooaofooa metamodel in the org.xtuml.bp.core source code on github or the metamodel project inside the BP welcome?
KeithFebruary 4, 2016 at 7:11 am #5557
I’m looking at the meta-model inside the BP Welcome. I think it is mostly classes and associations removed during the specific packages cleanup that still are present in the schema file.February 4, 2016 at 2:37 pm #5558cortKeymaster
You will see them removed in an upcoming community release. You can find a much more recent version in my fork of the mc repository (branch 8019_progen3).
Even it still needs a bit more cleaned out.
CortFebruary 4, 2016 at 3:53 pm #5559
Thanks for information. I’m updating the meta-model copy in our model compiler to be aligned with the 5.2.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.