Consistent meta-model and schema

Martin · February 3, 2016 at 3:05 pm

I’m looking into the meta-model included in the 5.2 version and comparing the model with the schema in 5.2 of the mc.c.source plugin. These does not seams to be consistent. I thought that the schema was generated based on the meta-model. Is it the intention that these shall differ? I suppose that the pre_builder output is consistent with the meta-model?

keithbrown · February 3, 2016 at 6:36 pm

Hi Martin,

Where exactly are you seeing a difference? Are you looking at the ooaofooa metamodel in the org.xtuml.bp.core source code on github or the metamodel project inside the BP welcome?

Regards, Keith

Martin · February 4, 2016 at 7:11 am

I’m looking at the meta-model inside the BP Welcome. I think it is mostly classes and associations removed during the specific packages cleanup that still are present in the schema file.

cort · February 4, 2016 at 2:37 pm

Martin, You will see them removed in an upcoming community release. You can find a much more recent version in my fork of the mc repository (branch 8019_progen3). Even it still needs a bit more cleaned out. Cort

Martin · February 4, 2016 at 3:53 pm

Hi,

Thanks for information. I’m updating the meta-model copy in our model compiler to be aligned with the 5.2.