Consistent meta-model and schema

homepage Forums BridgePoint Development and Integrations Consistent meta-model and schema

Tagged: ,

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5555
    Martin
    Participant

    I’m looking into the meta-model included in the 5.2 version and comparing the model with the schema in 5.2 of the mc.c.source plugin. These does not seams to be consistent. I thought that the schema was generated based on the meta-model. Is it the intention that these shall differ?
    I suppose that the pre_builder output is consistent with the meta-model?

    #5556
    keithbrown
    Keymaster

    Hi Martin,

    Where exactly are you seeing a difference? Are you looking at the ooaofooa metamodel in the org.xtuml.bp.core source code on github or the metamodel project inside the BP welcome?

    Regards,
    Keith

    #5557
    Martin
    Participant

    I’m looking at the meta-model inside the BP Welcome. I think it is mostly classes and associations removed during the specific packages cleanup that still are present in the schema file.

    #5558
    cort
    Keymaster

    Martin,
    You will see them removed in an upcoming community release. You can find a much more recent version in my fork of the mc repository (branch 8019_progen3).
    Even it still needs a bit more cleaned out.
    Cort

    #5559
    Martin
    Participant

    Hi,

    Thanks for information. I’m updating the meta-model copy in our model compiler to be aligned with the 5.2.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.